|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[
Contents
] [ INDEX ]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 133 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original paper The relationship between body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate Marija Klačar, Marija Zarić, Jagoda Popović |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Download in pdf format | SUMMARY:
INTRODUCTION: The increasing prevalence of chronic kidney
disease (CKD) is a major health problem. The prevalence of obesity
has also been rapidly increasing worldwide. Few studies have
examined the relationship between excess body weight and CKD risk.
Aim: To evaluate the possible contribution of increased body mass
index (BMI) to impaired renal function in the general population
sample. METHODS: The study involved 500 participants older
than 30 years (228 men, 272 women, age 57.58±13.68) who visited
their general practitioner in Health Center „Dr Simo Milosevic“.
Blood samples, blood pressure anthropometric measures were performed
on each participant. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was
calculated using the abbreviated equation from MDRD study (“The
Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study”) and CKD was defined as
eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Statistical analysis was performed
using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Somers, New York, USA). RESULTS:
The mean BMI was 25.09±3.54 kg/m2with 0.6% in underweight (BMI <
18.5 kg/m2), 17.6% in lower normal (BMI 18.5 to 21.9 kg/m2), 33.2%
in upper normal (BMI 22.0 to 24.9 kg/m2) and 48.6% in overweight or
obese (BMI > 25.0 kg/m2) body mass category. The mean eGFR was
100.33±30.78 ml/min/1.73m2 with 112±8.62 in underweight, 116.94±3.8
in lower normal, 102.37±2.39 in upper normal and 92.78±1.72 in
overweight or obese category. Estimated GFR values decreased
significantly with increasing BMI specially in those in upper normal
compared to lower normal (p < 0.001) and overweight and obese
compared to lower normal body mass category (p < 0.001). Compared
with participants with lower normal body mass, the non-adjusted odds
ratio (OR) for mildly or moderately reduced renal function (eGFR <
90 ml/min/1.73m2) was 2.54 (95% CI 1.41-4.56) for upper normal and
3.26 (95% CI 1.88-5.70) for overweight and obese participants. After
adjusting for potential confounding variables (age, sex, diabetes
mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia
and smoking status) OR for mildly or moderately reduced renal
function was 2.23 (95% CI 1.21-4.10) for upper normal 2.65 (95% CI
1.44-4.87) for overweight or obese participants compared to those in
lower normal body mass category. CONCLUSION: Estimated GFR
values decreased significantly with increasing BMI specially in
those in upper normal compared to lower normal (p < 0.001) and
overweight and obese compared to lower normal body mass category (p
< 0.001). This study showed that increasing BMI is strongly
associated with decreasing eGFR in the general population. The
underlying mechanism behind this association remains to be
investigated through prospective population- based studies. Key words: body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, chronic kidney disease, renal function, general population |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTIONChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem and
represents a big economic burden for health systems. Global
prevalence of CKD lies between 11 and 13% with the third stadium
having the largest share. All CKC stadiums are related to the
increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity, early death and/or
poorer quality of life [1]. MATERIAL AND METHODThe study was conducted as an observational analytical cross sectional study. The study involved participants older than 30 years who visited their general practitioner in Health Center ‘Dr Simo Milošević‘. Data collection was completed a month after the sample of 500 participants was formed. Blood samples, blood pressure and anthropometric measures were performed on each participant. Laboratory measurements involved determining of glucose, urea, creatinine, total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations and were performed on each of the participants. Blood pressure was measured on the left upper arm in a sitting position. Body mass and height were measured in the office and BMI was calculated as the quotient of body mass expressed in kilograms and square height expressed in meters. Based on the BMI values, the participants were classified into the categories shown in Table 1 [6]. Table 1. BMI categorization
Participants stated whether they were non-smokers, former or active smokers. Glomerular filtration rate was determined using the shortened formula from “The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study” [7].
Stadiums of renal insufficiency were given in the table 2 [8]. Table 2. Classification of chronic kidney disease
CKD is defined as GFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2. SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Somers, New York, USA) was used to create the database and analyze it. For testing of correlation between body mass index and glomerular filtration ratewith adjusting in relation to the associated variable logistical regression was used. The level of significance was 0.05. RESULTSThe study involved 500 participants, 228 (45.6%) men and 272 (54.4%) women. BMI mean value was 25.09±3,54 kg/m2 with 0.6% participants in the category of malnourished (ITM < 18.5 kg/m2), 17.6% in the group of body mass in the range of lower normal (BMI 18.5 up to 21.9 kg/m2), 33.2% in the group with upper normal body mass (BMI from 22.0 to 24.9 kg/m2) and 48.6% in the group of overweight or obese (ITM > 25.0 kg/m2) . Graph 1. Body mass distribution of participants
GFR mean value was 100.33 ± 30.78 ml/min/1.73m2. GFR mean values in categories according to BMI are presented in table 3. Table 3. eGFR in BMI categories
GFR considerably decreased with the increase of the BMI values
particularly in the category of overweight and obese participants
compared to the participants with lower normal body, (p < 0.001) as
well as in the group with upper normal body mass compared to the
group of lower normal body mass (p < 0.001). In comparison to the
participants in the group with lower normal body mass, the
non-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mild or moderately reduced renal
function (GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73m2) was 2.54 (95% CI 1.41-4.56) for
participants with upper normal body mass and 3.26 (95% CI 1.88-5.70)
for participants in the group of overweight and obese. DISCUSSIONSeveral previous studies pointed to the significance of the
increased body mass index in the development of chronic renal
disease. A cross-sectional study conducted in general population in
Japan showed that the increased BMI is associated with the decrease
of GFR only in men [9]. In the study conducted by Fox et al. ORfor
the development of new CKD was 23% (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08–1.41) for
the BMI increase by one SD [10]. Gelber et al. showed that the
initial increased BMI as well as its increase during the follow-up
period of 14 years is associated with increased risk from CKD [11]. Table 4. Studies that examined the association between obesity and chronic kidney disease
Most studies showed existence of a higher risk for CKD in
participants with the BMI which is equal to or greater than 25 kg/m2
while results of our study show increased risk for mild and
moderately impaired renal function in the group of participants with
upper normal body mass (BMI 22.0 to 24.9 kg/m2) as well as in the
category of overweight and obese (BMI≥25 kg/m2) compared to the
participants from the category of lower normal body mass. Figure 1. Assumed mechanisms of the role of obesity in the development of chronic kidney disease
CONCLUSIONEstimated GFR values decreased significantly with increasing BMI specially in those in upper normal compared to lower normal (p < 0.001) and overweight and obese compared to lower normal weight category (p < 0.001). This study showed that increasing BMI is strongly associated with decreasing eGFR in the general population. The underlying mechanism behind this association remains to be investigated through prospective population - based studies. LITERATURE:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[
Contents
] [ INDEX ]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|